1 page long | business law
The Task:Reflective learning is part of the development of your critical thinking skills. Reflectivelearning involves taking a personal experience, looking at your initial gut reaction to it,and quietly thinking about that gut reaction. It then involves building linkages betweenthat experience and other similar situations using your reasoning to test the strength ofthose linkages. Finally, it involves putting your thoughts out publicly to others, receivingtheir feedback, and thinking about how that feedback changes your initial thinking.In this case, I am going to ask you to reflect on a public Facebook page posting by auniversity student who wrote, “I no longer fear Hell, I took a course with Professor[Smith].”1Two or three students in each group are going to write a two-to-three-page doublespaced statement discussing whether they think it is right that a student should be ableto post such a public statement in writing or whether alternatively such an action is aviolation of the professor’s rights. You may take either position, but you must take aposition one way or the other and stay with it. You must provide two independentreasons to justify your position. This two to three-page document must be dropped intothe drop box at 11:59 p.m. the night before the class one week after the assignment isdistributed (i.e., 11:59 p.m. the night before class in week # 11). This portion will bemarked out of 4 marks.Then, the remainder of the students in each group will have until 11:59 p.m. the nightbefore the next class (i.e., 11:59 p.m. the night before class # 12) to discuss theconsequences of the position taken in the first part of the paper in terms ofconsequences for students, professors, and education at universities as a whole, andthe consequences for other situations where these same rights come into play. Inaddition, the second part of the group will provide one positive comment about thecontent of the first part of the paper and one area where they think there could be1Quotation taken from G. Saad, “Student Criticizing Professors Online: A Right or a Violation?”
2improvement and why. This second part of the paper may be up to five pages in length,but no more.The Marking of the Assignment:Four marks will be allocated to the first part of the paper, evaluating how well youexpress a clear position on the issue and the quality of the two reasons you provide tojustify your position.Six marks will be allocated to the second part of the paper. Two will be allocated to howwell you discuss the consequences for students, professors, and education atuniversities as a whole as well as to other situations where these same rights may ariseand collide. Part of the grading for this will be on how insightful your discussion is onthis aspect of the paper. Then two marks will be allocated for the quality of thediscussion on the positive aspect of the first paper you identify and the area forimprovement you identify, particularly in regard to your reasoning
https://ift.tt/3FQoF2c Order this and many more Essays and assignments from https://ift.tt/3FQoF2c
The following questions/issues will lead the discussion of this topic; you can add your own questions.
